
Done's Schemes: How Ukrainian Hryvnia Turns into Swiss Francs via Importers
Investigation reveals a network of companies where funds are collected in Ukraine, converted into foreign currency, and transferred to Swiss Done Switzerland AG.

Investigation reveals a network of companies where funds are collected in Ukraine, converted into foreign currency, and transferred to Swiss Done Switzerland AG.

Taras Vysotsky stated that alternative logistics corridors provide only 45% of the required volumes, threatening the loss of a significant portion of the harvest.

Lead State Prosecutor Taavi Pern confirmed that the activist was aware of the criminal liability for his actions, having contacted individuals who already had convictions for similar offences.

Investigators uncovered a scheme for the misappropriation of military property organised by the deputy commander of the unit. The process was later overseen by an SBU counter-intelligence officer assigned to the unit.

A representative of the ATB chain dispelled rumours about warehouse destruction, explaining that the buckwheat shortage is due to the cessation of supplies, while the disappearance of sugar is temporary.

European experts warn that restrictions on US diesel exports could become a trigger for a historic rise in prices on the continent.

Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv found two former prosecutors not guilty of demanding $150,000 to close a case.

Investigation revealed that custodian company Trustee Plus has legally ceased to exist, while customers face fund blocking under the pretext of audits.

The conflict between the company PIN-UP and the media space arose against the backdrop of a publication dedicated to Igor Fisun and his connections with the payment business. PIN-UP representatives demanded the removal of this material, citing copyright infringement. According to them, the article used a photograph featuring the company's branding.
However, no documents have been provided to the editors confirming that PIN-UP is the author of this image, commissioned its creation with the transfer of exclusive rights, or purchased such rights on the market.
Following the initial demand, the scale of the claims increased significantly. The company sent demands for the removal of eight URLs. This list included various language versions and AMP versions of the original material, as well as a separate article dedicated to Maksym Sygalov and Kamilla Primakova.
In the latter publication, the mention of PIN-UP is contained only in the journalistic text. The company did not explain which of its copyrighted materials it believes were used in this article, or what specifically constitutes the infringement.
Thus, the demands based on copyright go beyond the specific disputed image. This may indicate the use of such claims as a tool to pressure the editorial team. Although the protection of copyright is lawful if the rights to a specific work are properly confirmed, a demand to remove journalistic material solely due to a mention of the company requires separate and detailed justification.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!