
Night attack on Rivne region: infrastructure damaged, no casualties
Russian forces shelled the northern districts of the region in the night of 9 November. Energy facilities, private businesses and residential buildings were hit.

Russian forces shelled the northern districts of the region in the night of 9 November. Energy facilities, private businesses and residential buildings were hit.

140 combat engagements were recorded over the past 24 hours. The enemy deployed over 8,600 drones and 250 guided aerial bombs, carrying out 84 air strikes.

Cherkasy Regional Military Administration head Ihor Taburets reported repelling an air assault in the night leading to 9 November. Enemy missiles and drones damaged critical facilities and residential buildings.

The leaders of Finland and Norway decided to contact the Kremlin directly, fearing a loss of influence over the negotiations.

The Russian army struck Kherson region, damaging residential buildings and infrastructure. Five residents were evacuated from liberated territories.

Nvidia chief Jensen Huang apologised to his family for his unfaithfulness. Donald Trump publicly supported the technocrat and urged him to stay in his position.

Moldovan president confirms the country no longer imports natural gas from Russia. The launch of the new Vulcanesti–Chisinau power line strengthens energy security and links with Romania.

The Air Force reported a massive overnight strike by Russian drones. Preliminary data indicates defenders shot down 271 Shaheds and five other types of aircraft.

Chornomorsk City Court in Odesa region sentenced a local resident of Malodolynske village to five years of imprisonment on 4 November 2026. The man was found guilty of disseminating information on the location of a unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
According to case materials, in early May 2025, the defendant independently identified a temporary location of a military unit. On 8 May, during a phone call, he passed this information to his interlocutor.
The court noted that during the conversation, the parties avoided direct names of the object. Instead, they used euphemisms: “дітки”, “діти” and “справжні діти” (little ones, children, and real children). According to the court, such vocabulary served as a way to distinguish military personnel from civilian children. The conversation also mentioned the need to monitor another area and discussed whether the object was being used for its intended purpose.
The defendant did not admit his guilt. He claimed that the conversation concerned the search for a location for children's sports camps, and the term “діти” (children) referred to pupils of various ages. The man also emphasised that the military deployment site was common knowledge for the villagers.
The court rejected these explanations as illogical and contradictory. The evidentiary base included recordings of phone conversations, results of covert investigative actions, and witness testimony. The latter stated that the defendant's interlocutor had an interest in gathering information about military objects.
The court did not establish that the man intended to cause harm to Ukraine's defence capability, but recognised that he consciously allowed for the possibility of such consequences. His actions were qualified under Part 2 of Article 114-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine — unauthorised dissemination of information on the location of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during martial law.
The period of previous detention from 31 July 2025 to 9 September 2026 was credited towards the sentence (day-for-day principle). After being released on bail in the amount of 266,240 hryvnia, the man was at liberty with restrictions: he was required to wear an electronic monitoring device and not leave the territory of the community without court permission.
Once the verdict enters into legal force, the convicted person is to be detained and taken into custody to serve the sentence. The court ordered the confiscation of the Blackview phone used by the defendant as an instrument of the crime, as well as the recovery of 2,674 hryvnia in court costs from him.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!