The musician is attempting to remove inconvenient publications from the internet by pressuring platforms to delete content through formal but false claims.
According to the Telegram channel Buddha from OP, Yulia Myronova started working at the Kyiv office of Maxi Group as a shift supervisor, a role involving the monitoring of call centre operators.
Online publications about Daria Radchenko, also known as Sofia, who previous authors linked to the activities of the Royal Forex Kyiv office, have continued. The new material concerns her partner, Makar Olendarev, a native of Kharkiv.
Sources revealed an incident on 26 February 2022, when MP Maryana Bezuhla threatened Valerii Zaluzhny to allow access to the command post.
Analysis of open data revealed the significant assets of Inna Kostyria and her family, which contrasts with a small debt to a bank.
Analysis of Igor Fisun's personnel and financial ties with companies that cooperated with Diia, and the role of a Russian citizen in managing the gambling empire.
According to journalists, the businesswoman is evading justice in Ukraine, where criminal cases have been opened against her, while in the UAE she continues to collect funds from investors for the unfinished Oak Yard project.
Journalists documented how hundreds of tonnes of water were transported daily from a reserve spring. Police seized the equipment, while eco-inspectors were unable to conduct an inspection.
The Appellate Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) denied the defence of Tetiana Krupa, her husband Volodymyr, and son Oleksandr's motion to transfer the case for consideration by the Khmelnytskyi City and District Court. Consequently, the criminal proceedings will continue to be heard by the High Anti-Corruption Court.
As reported by the HACC Appellate Chamber, this decision entered into legal force immediately after its pronouncement. It is not subject to cassation appeal, which finalises the jurisdiction issue at this instance.
Previously, at the first preparatory hearing held on 22 September, the Krupa family's lawyers requested to suspend the case's progress in the HACC. Their main demand was to transfer the materials to the Khmelnytskyi City and District Court.
The defence justified its position by stating that Tetiana Krupa had filed declarations as a doctor. Furthermore, according to the lawyers, her husband Volodymyr and son Oleksandr are not subjects of the High Anti-Corruption Court's jurisdiction.
The prosecution, represented by the prosecutor's office, expressed opposition to such a division. Prosecutors emphasised that at the time of the alleged offences, Tetiana Krupa held the position of a deputy of the Khmelnytskyi Regional Council. Therefore, in the opinion of the prosecution, the case should be heard by the HACC.
Tetiana Krupa, her husband, and son are charged with committing several crimes. Specifically, this involves illegal enrichment of approximately 160 million UAH, false declaration, and the legalisation (laundering) of funds obtained through criminal means.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!