PROSUD reveals Judge Oleksandr Boyko's asset discrepancies and details of his disciplinary proceedings

PROSUD reveals Judge Oleksandr Boyko's asset discrepancies and details of his disciplinary proceedings
PROSUD reveals Judge Oleksandr Boyko's asset discrepancies and details of his disciplinary proceedings

Activists' investigation: property and ties with relatives

The monitoring platform PROSUD published the results of an audit of the declarations of Oleksandr Boyko, a judge at the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv. The analysis revealed significant discrepancies between declared income and actual asset status, as well as violations in professional activity.

In 2015, the judge's wife, Tetyana Boyko, purchased two apartments of 95.3 and 82.1 square metres for a total of 300,000 hryvnias. At the same time, the market value of similar housing at that time was approximately 877 US dollars per square metre, which amounted to about 155,000 dollars for both properties. Two other apartments in the same building belonged to Tetyana's mother, Anna Luhovska. The judge also used a service apartment of 89.9 square metres.

PROSUD experts noted that previous declarations lacked the couple's shares in properties of 192 and 199 square metres. The 2025 declaration lists five real estate objects with a total area of 459.53 square metres, a land plot of 1,200 square metres, and joint ownership with Nadiia Boyko and Dmytro Luhovskyi. Specifically, an apartment of 93.13 square metres is divided between Tetyana (66%) and Dmytro (34%). An object of 199.8 square metres is also registered in the name of Dmytro Luhovskyi.

Vehicle fleet and financial flows

In 2025, the Boyko couple registered a BMW i7 xDrive60 worth 2.412 million hryvnias. The purchase was made through the company "Injoy Cars" (EDRPOU 43183794), owned by Klym Lytomin and Pavlo Usenko. The National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) recorded transactions involving this car for amounts of 2.1 million and 312,000 hryvnias. It is noted that the seller completed the reporting year with a loss of 144,000 hryvnias. In addition, the declaration contains two entries regarding rights to a 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser 150 worth 1.516 million hryvnias.

Tetyana Boyko received 139,413 hryvnias from the private enterprise "Sofia" (EDRPOU 30501437), which is linked to deputy Oleksandr Nabilskyi. Nabilskyi's structures are involved in criminal proceedings No. 42025270000000070 under Part 2 of Article 364 and Part 1 of Article 239 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The charges relate to abuse of power, pollution of 2 hectares of land, violation of landfill operation rules, and possible evasion of ecological tax. On 10 September 2026, a search was conducted at "Sofia", and on 18 September the court seized the extracted documents (decision No. 140017083).

Companies "Eko-Service-Kozelets" (EDRPOU 37894785), "Chystyi-Svit-Kozelets" (EDRPOU 45126900), "EkoKlianVaste" (EDRPOU 44665340), and "Budivelnnyi servis Kozelets" (EDRPOU 41479357) are also linked to deputy Nabilskyi. The revenue of the five firms for 2025 was 30.4 million hryvnias, of which 5.22 million went to "Sofia". The construction firm "Budivelnnyi servis Kozelets" participated in 97 tenders, with sales of 3.96 million hryvnias in 2025 and 6.02 million hryvnias in 2026. The company "Sofia" previously featured in a case involving 279,600 hryvnias of budget funds, in which the official was acquitted.

Tetyana Boyko owns 10% of the shares in the company "Prime Foods Ukraine" (EDRPOU 35875514). Her partners are Lyudmyla Zozulya (65%) and Serhiy Shevchuk (25%). PROSUD found that this share was not indicated in previous declarations. A debt of 56,308 hryvnias in value-added tax was previously recovered from the company.

Cash reserves and family income

The family's cash savings changed over recent years: 83,000 US dollars in 2023, 99,000 dollars in 2024, and 75,000 dollars in 2025. Additionally, 182,410 hryvnias were held in bank accounts.

Oleksandr Boyko's income includes 1.824 million hryvnias in salary and 80,000 hryvnias as a gift from Nadiia Boyko. The judge's wife received 90,000 hryvnias from Anna Luhovska and 124,886 hryvnias in insurance payouts. Between 2014 and 2016, the judge earned 862,000 hryvnias. Tetyana Boyko declared income of 116,000 hryvnias for 2014 and pension payments of 25,800 hryvnias in 2015 and 2016.

However, during the same period, the family received 420,000 hryvnias in insurance payouts, held 40,000 dollars and 208,000 hryvnias in cash. Oleksandr Boyko declared loans of 10,000 dollars over two years.

Disciplinary violations and justice issues

On 6 May 2017, Oleksandr Boyko was detained while driving under the influence of alcohol. The court imposed a fine of 10,200 hryvnias and a one-year ban on driving (decision No. 67169676). The medical certificate, issued by the Chernihiv police at 08:35, contains contradictions: the blood test was allegedly conducted in Kyiv at 09:05. The appellate instance rejected this document.

In 2018, the disciplinary chamber demanded the judge's dismissal, but the High Council of Justice replaced the punishment with a six-month suspension from office.

An analysis of 348 cases under Article 130 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences (drunk driving) for 2018–2020 showed that 22 cases were closed due to the expiration of review deadlines. In five cases (No. 752/7520/18, 752/7907/18, 752/7521/18, 752/7517/18, 752/7490/18), the High Council of Justice established violations. In two cases (No. 752/15088/20 and 752/1450/20), drivers were released from liability due to the minor nature of the offence. In 2024, the judge received a warning for a violation.

Embezzlement case No. 1-101/12 (Articles 191, 364, 366 of the Criminal Code) was under the judge's jurisdiction from 2011 to 2018 without a verdict being issued. Following a complaint by People's Deputy Arseniy Pushkarenko, the High Council of Justice found the review excessively prolonged, but did not establish groundless delay.

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first!

Leave a comment

Links are not allowed in comments. The editors may remove comments without explanation.
Back to top ↑