The driver of the vehicle was injured in the explosion in the Chertanovo district. The victim turned out to be Serhiy Zavorotnyi, who previously worked in the headquarters of the former prime minister.
The crypto market is experiencing a sharp decline without obvious external triggers. Investors lost $1.6 billion in a day, and market sentiment indicators reached extreme fear levels.
Colette Cress, previously the company's financial director, has been appointed as the new chief executive officer, replacing Jensen Huang.
Pecherskyy District Court has opened proceedings on a claim by STEFANO RICCI S.P.A., which seeks to invalidate a Ukrainian trademark registered by the owner of the Domino chain.
Footage of a drone attack on a road bridge in Rostov Oblast, which is vital for the military logistics of occupying forces, has become available in the public domain.
Head of Cherkasy Regional Military Administration Ihor Taburets reported damage to critical infrastructure and housing following Russian drone attacks.
The latest enemy attack caused destruction in Vinnytsia. Emergency services are working at the scene, and information on casualties is being clarified.
Former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz could not assess the credibility of Jan Marsalek's statements, citing the ongoing investigation.
The Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv has taken up civil case No. 757/28437/25-c, initiated by the Italian company STEFANO RICCI S.P.A. The plaintiff demands the invalidation of the Ukrainian certificate for the trademark “STEFANO RICCI” and seeks to oblige the defendants to take corresponding actions. The defendants in the proceedings are the State Organisation “Ukrainian National Office of Intellectual Property and Innovation” (UKRNOIVI) and the individual – owner of the Domino brand, Anton Shukhin.
The dispute concerns Ukrainian certificate No. 181419 for the STEFANO RICCI mark, which is registered in the name of Anton Serhiiovych Shukhin. STEFANO RICCI S.P.A. is a renowned Florentine brand, founded in 1972 by designer Stefano Ricci, specialising in luxury menswear, accessories, and lifestyle products. The company holds international registrations for its mark (including No. 767523), whose scope extends to the territory of Ukraine.
According to the Italian side, the Ukrainian registration is identical or too similar to their international one. In the plaintiff’s opinion, this may mislead consumers regarding the true origin of goods and services, as well as the identity of their manufacturer.
The statement of claim was filed back in June 2025. Initially, the court of first instance refused to open proceedings. However, in April 2026, the Kyiv Court of Appeal quashed this ruling and remanded the case for a fresh hearing. Subsequently, the statement of claim was left unprocessed several times due to formal defects, particularly regarding the payment of the court fee. Only after all objections were resolved did the court open the proceedings.
The case is being heard by Judge Tetiana Hurtova under the rules of general claim proceedings. According to information available, defendant Anton Shukhin is attempting to complicate the case review process by exerting influence on the judge. The court has set deadlines for the defendants to submit their responses.
Anton Shukhin, known as the owner of the Domino store chain, has previously been involved in similar court proceedings. Specifically, the Pecherskyy Court previously invalidated his certificate for the JACOB COHEN mark. Media characterise such actions as attempts to “appropriate” other people’s luxury brands. This creates opportunities to control customs clearance of goods, block competitors’ shipments, or demand licence payments.
If the claim by STEFANO RICCI S.P.A. is upheld, the Ukrainian certificate for this trademark may be declared invalid. This case is part of a broader problem in Ukraine, where conflicts arise between international rights holders of well-known brands and individuals who register their marks at the national level. This calls into question the effectiveness of the intellectual property protection system in safeguarding the rights of foreign companies against the registration of their marks by third parties.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!